A man has died after being trapped under a weightlifting bar in a “very tragic” accident.

A man has died after being trapped under a weightlifting bar in a “very tragic” accident.

Reporting on an investigation can be one of the most difficult types of stories a journalist can write.

Often, these sessions are emotionally charged and attended by people who are distressed and desperate for answers.

At times, inquests can appear quite clinical due to the coroner’s need to remain neutral and composed in order to be able to draw conclusions from very distressing events.

As painful as these procedures are for those who have lost a loved one, the lessons that can be learned from investigations can go a long way in saving the lives of others.

Families are often surprised — and sometimes angry — when they see a reporter in attendance.

Understandably, they worry that the nature of their loved one’s death will be sensationalized and that the news story will forever tarnish their memory.

Responsible and ethically minded journalists will do their best to cover investigations sensitively, while not shying away from often disturbing facts.

It is important that the public does not forget that investigations are a type of judicial investigation; After all, they are being held in the coroner’s court.

The press has a legal right to be present at investigations, and has a responsibility to report on them as part of its duty to uphold the principle of “open justice.”

But in doing so, journalists must follow the guidelines provided by the Independent Press Standards Organization and set out in the Editors’ Code of Conduct.

It is a journalist’s duty to ensure that the public understands the reasons for someone’s death and to ensure that their death is not kept a secret.

The inquest report can also clear up any rumors or doubts surrounding the person’s death.

But most important of all, an investigative report can draw attention to conditions that might prevent further deaths.

Investigations are not criminal courts – there is no prosecution or defense – they are fact-finding courts that seek to answer four main questions:

  • Who is the person who died?
  • Where did they die?
  • When did they die?
  • How did they die?

They do not distribute blame.

Once these questions have been answered, the coroner will be able to record a conclusion.

The broader lessons to be learned from an investigation could have far-reaching consequences – but if journalists don’t attend, how can the public be educated?

The harsh truth is that they can’t. Often the investigating judge does not publish the results of the investigation.

If journalists abstain from attending investigations, the entire arm of the judicial system will not be held accountable – and many others who need to answer vital questions.

Investigations can often lead to wider discussion about serious issues, most recently mental health and suicide.

Editors ask and encourage reporters to talk to the family and friends of the person under investigation.

Their contributions help us build a clearer picture of the deceased person and also provide the opportunity to honor their loved ones.

Often, families do not want to speak to the press, and of course this decision must be respected.

However, as we have seen in the many wonderful campaigns run by newspapers and websites across the country, the contribution of a person’s family and friends can make a huge difference in helping to save others.

Without the presence of the press in investigations, questions will remain unanswered, debates will remain uncontested, and lives will be lost.

You may also like...

Leave a Reply